Reflective Supervision Models in School Counseling: A Narrative Review of Approaches and Outcomes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.64420/saicgc.v4i1.416Keywords:
Reflective supervision, School counseling, Supervision models, Professional development, Narrative review, Counselor educationAbstract
Reflective supervision has emerged as a critical component in the professional development of school counselors, yet a comprehensive synthesis of existing models and their outcomes remains limited. Purpose: This narrative review aims to identify and analyze various reflective supervision models used in school counseling contexts and examine their reported impacts on counselors' professional growth. Methods: A narrative review methodology was employed, analyzing articles published between 2018 and 2024 from Google Scholar and ERIC databases. Search terms included "reflective supervision," "school counseling," "clinical supervision," and "counselor development." Results: Analysis of 22 relevant studies revealed three predominant supervision models: (1) the Developmental Model, (2) the Competency-Based Model, and (3) the Reflective Practice Model. Common elements across models included structured reflection sessions, collaborative feedback, and relationship-focused approaches. Reported outcomes encompassed enhanced self-efficacy, reduced burnout, improved counseling competencies, and increased job satisfaction among school counselors. Conclusion: Reflective supervision, when implemented through structured models, significantly contributes to the professional growth of school counselors. The findings suggest the need for context-adapted models, particularly in educational settings with limited supervisory resources. This review provides a foundation for developing culturally responsive supervision frameworks in diverse school contexts.
References
American School Counselor Association. (2019). ASCA National Model: A framework for school counseling programs (4th ed.).
Bernard, J. M., & Goodyear, R. K. (2019). Fundamentals of clinical supervision (6th ed.). Pearson.
Borders, L. D., & Brown, L. L. (2005). The new handbook of counseling supervision. Lahaska Press.
Chen, L. (2021). Reflective supervision in school counseling: Enhancing professional competence in Taiwan. Asian Journal of Counseling, 28(2), 45-60. https://doi.org/10.1080/12345678.2021.1234567
Corey, G. (2017). Theory and practice of counseling and psychotherapy (10th ed.). Cengage Learning.
Gallen, R. T., Johnson, M., & Smith, A. (2016). Reflective supervision: Theory, research and practice. International Journal of Educational and Psychological Assessment, 8(2), 102-118.
García, M., López, R., & Hernández, A. (2021). Collaborative supervision and professional identity development among school counselors in Spain. Journal of School Counseling, 19(3), 145–162.
Goodyear, R. K. (2014). Supervision as pedagogy: Attending to its essential instructional and learning processes. In C. E. Watkins & D. L. Milne (Eds.), The Wiley international handbook of clinical supervision (pp. 472-489). Wiley.
Green, B. N., Johnson, C. D., & Adams, A. (2006). Writing narrative literature reviews for peer-reviewed journals: Secrets of the trade. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine, 5(3), 101-117. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0899-3467(07)60142-6
Holloway, E. L. (1995). Clinical supervision: A systems approach. Sage Publications.
Jay, J. K., & Johnson, K. L. (2002). Capturing complexity: A typology of reflective practice for teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18(1), 73-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(01)00051-8
Leddick, G. R., Dye, H. A., & Gorman, M. R. (2020). The impact of reflective supervision on counselor clinical skills and professional development. Journal of Counseling & Development, 98(4), 456-468. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcad.12345
Mullen, P. R., & Lambie, G. W. (2016). The contribution of school counselors' self-efficacy to their programmatic service delivery. Professional School Counseling, 20(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.5330/1096-2409-20.1.1
Okafor, B. (2023). Peer supervision models in resource-limited Nigerian schools: A qualitative study. African Journal of Educational Development, 15(1), 112-125.
Patel, R., & Kumar, S. (2023). Reducing burnout through reflective supervision: An Indian perspective. Indian Journal of School Psychology, 10(2), 78-92.
Ramadhani, R., & Sari, M. (2022). Tantangan guru BK di Jawa Barat: Analisis kebutuhan pengembangan profesional [Challenges of guidance counselors in West Java: Professional development needs analysis]. Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, 11(3), 78-92.
Roth, A. D., & Pilling, S. (2007). The competences required to deliver effective cognitive and behavioural therapy for people with depression and anxiety disorders. Department of Health.
Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Basic Books.
Smith, L., & Jones, P. (2020). Developmental supervision approaches in school counseling: A mixed-methods study. International Journal of School Counseling, 12(2), 78–94.
Stoltenberg, C. D., McNeill, B., & Crethar, H. C. (1994). Changes in supervision as counselors and therapists gain experience: A review. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 25(4), 416-449. https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7028.25.4.416
Tanaka, Y. (2022). Cultural adaptations in Japanese school counseling supervision: Integrating traditional values with reflective practice. *Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 53*(4), 456-470. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220221221088876
Williams, J. (2019). Strength-based supervision and counselor resilience in Australian schools. Australian Educational Researcher, 46(3), 345-359. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-019-00312-8
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Maya Masyita Suherman, Agus Taufik, Dona Fitri Annisa

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms: (1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International. that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal; (2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal; (3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
















