Perbedaan Hasil Belajar Siswa Menggunakan Model Pembelajaran PBL dan CLT pada Mata Pelajaran IPS Kelas VII MTs Pancasila Kota Bengkulu
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.64420/jetlr.v1i2.270Keywords:
Learning Model, PBL, CTL, Social StudiesAbstract
This research aims to determine the differences in social studies learning outcomes of students who use the Problem Based Learning learning model and the Contextual Teaching Learning model at MTS Pancasila, Bengkulu City. This type of research is quantitative with an experimental approach. Data collection techniques are observation, tests, documentation and interviews. The population and sample in this research were 15 students in class VII A and 15 students in class VII B at MTS Pancasila, Bengkulu City. Which uses total sampling technique. The data analysis technique uses the independent sample t test. Based on the research results, it can be concluded that there are differences in social studies learning outcomes using the Problem Based Learning learning model and the Contextual Teaching Learning learning model for class VII MTS Pancasila students in Bengkulu City. As proven by the results of the "t" test, tcount = 3.157, while ttable with a significance level of 5% is 2.025. the results of tcount > ttable (3.157 > 2.025) which means that the working hypothesis (Ha) in this research is accepted, namely that there are differences in social studies learning outcomes between students taught using the Problem Based Learning learning model and the Contextual Teaching Learning learning model. It is proven that the average value is (????̅)1 = 77 and those using the Contextual Theacing Learning learning model with an average of (????̅)2 = 65.
References
Ahmad Susanto 2013, Teori Belajar dan Pembelajaran Di Sekolah Dasar (Jakarta: Kencana.
Amir, M. Taufiq. 2010. Inovasi Pendidikan Melalui Problem Based Learning.
Ari Wijayanti dkk. 2016, Efektifitas model CTL dan model PBL, Universitas negeri Jogyakarta.
Aris Shoimin 2016, 68 Model Pembelajaran Inovatif dalam Kurikulum 2013 (Yogyakarta: AR-Ruzz Media.
Fadhli, Y. R., & Yoenanto, N. H. (2021). Efektivitas pelatihan contextual teaching and learning (CTL) guna meningkatkan kompetensi pedagogik guru sekolah dasar di Pulau Sebatik.Jurnal Psikologi TALENTA
Glynn, S. M. dan Linda K. W. 2004. Contextual Teaching and Learning of Science in Elementary Schools. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 16, 51-63.
Hamruni. (2012). Strategi pembelajaran. Yogyakarta: Insan Madani.
Heruman. 2014. Model Pembelajaran Matematika di Sekolah Dasar. Bandung: Jakarta: Kencana.
Johnson, E.B. (2009). Contextual teaching and learning. USA: A sage publications company
Khat Utsman Thaha 2014, Al-Quran Terjemahan Al-Hamid (Jakarta: Beras.
Kiki Saputra 2015 , Pendidikan Berbasis Entrepreneurship (Yogyakarta: DIVA Press,).
Oemar Hamalik 2014, Kurikulum dan Pembelajaran (Jakarta: PT Bumi Aksara.
PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Rudi Gunawan 2014 , Pengembangan Kompetensi Guru IPS (Bandung: Alfabeta.
Rusman. (2011). Model-model pembelajaran Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
Shoimin, A. (2017). 68 Model Pembelajaran Inovatif dalam Kurikulum 2013. Yogyakarta: Ar-Ruz Media
Sugiyono 2015, Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D (Bandung: Alfabeta.
Trianto 2011, Model Pembelajaran Terpadu (Jakarta: PT Bumi Aksara.
Utomo, P., Asvio, N., & Prayogi, F. (2024). Metode Penelitian Tindakan Kelas (PTK): Panduan Praktis untuk Guru dan Mahasiswa di Institusi Pendidikan. Pubmedia Jurnal Penelitian Tindakan Kelas Indonesia, 1(4), 19. https://doi.org/10.47134/ptk.v1i4.821
Wiratna Sujarweni 2014, Metodologi Penelitian (Yogyakarta: Pustaka Baru Pres.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Yemi Herka Putriani, Desy Eka Citra Dewi, M. IIham Gilang

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms: (1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International. that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal; (2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal; (3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.