Addressing Gender in Higher Education Exit Exams: A Systematic Literature Review
Keywords:
Gender, Exit exams, Higher education, Equity, Performance, Perception, PolicyAbstract
Background: Exit exams in higher education are crucial for certifying student competency and ensuring academic quality. However, growing attention has been directed toward gender-related disparities in exam performance, perceptions, and outcomes, raising concerns about fairness and equity in assessment practices. Objective: This systematic review aims to explore how gender influences students’ experiences with exit exams in higher education, focusing on performance, perception, and broader implications for equity and quality assurance. Method: Using the PRISMA framework, a comprehensive search was conducted across multiple academic databases. From an initial pool of 587 articles, 32 studies published between 1994 and 2024 were selected based on predefined inclusion criteria. Data extraction focused on study objectives, methodologies, contexts, and gender-specific findings. Result: The findings reveal that while female students often achieve performance levels equal to or higher than their male peers, they report elevated levels of test anxiety and face systemic biases that affect their exam experiences. Sociocultural norms, exam design, and institutional policies significantly contribute to these disparities. Conclusion: Gender differences in exit exam experiences underscore the need for inclusive and equitable assessment systems. Addressing these disparities requires reforms in exam design, support mechanisms, and institutional practices that account for gender-specific challenges. Contribution: This review contributes to the literature by systematically synthesizing evidence on gender and exit exams, highlighting the need for gender-sensitive assessment practices and offering recommendations for policy and educational reform in higher education.
References
Ackeren, I., Klein, E., & Kuhlee, D. (2012). The impact of statewide exit exams: A descriptive case study of three German states with differing low-stakes exam regimes. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 20(8), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v20n8.2012
Adale, M. Y., & Kefale, K. B. (2023). A review on implementation challenges and measures of exit exam to enhance and assure the quality of engineering education at Ethiopia HEIs. Journal of Higher Education Research, 8(5), 225–231. https://doi.org/org/10.11648/j.her.20230806.13
Al Ahmad, M., Al Marzouqi, A. H., & Hussien, M. (2014). Exit exam as academic performance indicator. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology - TOJET, 13(3), 58–67. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICeLeTE.2013.6644378
Aniley, A. A. (2023). Comprehensive review on exit examination strategies and its role for enhancement of quality assurance and employability opportunity in engineering and technology programs. IETE Journal of Education, 64(1), 41–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/09747338.2022.2118874
Aristeidou, M., Cross, S., Rossade, K.-D., Wood, C., Rees, T., & Paci, P. (2024). Online exams in higher education: Exploring distance learning students’ acceptance and satisfaction. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 40(1), 342–359. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12888
Athiworakun, C., & Adunyarittigun, D. (2022). Investigating washback effects on teaching: A case study of an exit examination at the higher education level. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 15(2), 777–800. http://so04.tci-thaijo.org
Ayenew, E., & Yohannes, A. G. (2022). Assessing higher education exit exam in Ethiopia: Practices, challenges and prospects. Science Journal of Education, 10(2), 79–86. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjedu.20221002.15
Baker, D. (2019). Pathways to racial equality in higher education: Modeling the antecedents of state affirmative action bans. American Research Journal, 56(5), 1861–1895. https://www.Wiley.org/stable/45200627
Belando-Montoro, M. R., Naranjo-Crespo, M., & Carrasco-Temino, M. A. (2022). Barriers and facilitators to the retention and participation of socially, economically, and culturally disadvantaged university students. An international systematic review. International Journal of Educational Research, 113, 101968. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2022.101968
Benner, A. (2023). Exit examinations, peer academic climate, and adolescents’ developmental outcomes. Journal of School Psychology, 51(1), 67–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JSP.2012.09.001
Bishop, J. (1999). Are national exit examinations important for educational efficiency? Swedish Economic Policy Review, 6, 349–398. https://hdl.handle.net/1813/75286
Bracey, G. (2009). Mandatory exit exams discourage graduation: Research does not support political claims that exit exams improve graduation results. Phi Delta Kappan, 91(3), 88–95.
Carol, V., & Brown, M. F. (1994). The development of an exit examination in criminal justice for graduating seniors: A case study. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 5(1), 49–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511259400083081
Christina, J. J., & Moorthy, D. (2021). Multiple entry and exit options in degree courses. NEP 2020, 135–141. https://www.SematicScholar.net/publication/373069856 Dehury, R. (2017). Exit exams for medical graduates: A guarantee of quality? Indian Journal of Medical Ethics, 2(3), 190–193. https://doi.org/10.20529/IJME.2017.037
Dempster, E. (2012). Comparison of exit-level examinations in four African countries. Journal of Social Sciences, 33, 55–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/09718923.2012.11893086
El-Hussan, H., et al. (2021). Student perception of curriculum-based exit exam in civil engineering education. Global Engineering Education Conference, 214–218. https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON46332.2021.9454016
French, S. (2023). A review of the benefits and drawbacks of high-stakes final examinations in higher education. The International Journal of Higher Education, 88, 893–918. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-023-01148-z
Geronimus, A. T., James, S. A., Destin, M., Graham, L. F., Hatzenbuehler, M. L., Murphy, M. C., ... & Thompson, J. P. (2016). Jedi public health: Co-creating an identity-safe culture to promote health equity. SSM-population health, 2, 105-116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2016.02.008
Guo, W., Bai, B., Zang, F., Wang, T., & Song, H. (2023). Influences of motivation and grit on students’ self-regulated learning and English learning achievement: A comparison between male and female students. System, 114, 103018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2023.103018
Houchensen, D. (2023). “Stakes is high”: Culturally relevant practitioner inquiry with African American students struggling to pass secondary reading exit exams. Urban Education, 48(1), 92–115. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085912456845
Jia, Q., & Ericson, D. P. (2017). Equity and access to higher education in China: Lessons from Hunan province for university admissions policy. International Journal of Educational Development, 52, 97-110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2016.10.011
Khan, H., Sebu, Gaur, P., Kumar, A., & Rahman, M. u. (2023). Pharmacy exit exam for the upliftment of profession of pharmacy practice in India: A review. International Journal of Pharma Professional’s Research (IJPPR), 14(4), 107–112. http://dx.doi.org/10.48165/ijppronline.2023.14408
Lanahan, B. (2023). Higher education in as politics in Poar-Rose revolution in Georgia: Corruption, tutoring, and higher education entrance exams. Springer NATURE Link, 107–115. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-45194-2_8
Lechman, E., & Popowska, M. (2022). Overcoming gender bias in the digital economy. Empirical evidence for European countries. Gender, Technology and Development, 26(3), 404-436. https://doi.org/10.1080/09718524.2022.2127064
Leigh, S. (2012). The classroom is alive with the sound of thinking: The power of the exit slip. The International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 24(2), 189–196. http://www.isetl.org/ijtlhe/
Mangubhai, S., & Lawless, S. (2021). Exploring gender inclusion in small-scale fisheries management and development in Melanesia. Marine Policy, 123, 104287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2020.104287
Merki, K. (2011). Effects of the implementation of state-wide exit exams on students’ self-regulated learning. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 37, 196–205. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2011.12.001
Newbery, R., Lean, J., Moizer, J., & Haddoud, M. (2018). Entrepreneurial identity formation during the initial entrepreneurial experience: The influence of simulation feedback and existing identity. Journal of Business Research, 85, 51-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.12.013
O'Grady, C. E., Ostrosky, M. M., Corr, C., & Roy, E. (2024). Exploring how early childhood exclusionary practices persist for multiply marginalized children. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 68, 90-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2024.04.008
Palmer, E. J., Duggan, P., Devitt, P. G., & Russell, R. (2010). The modified essay question: Its exit from the exit examination? Medical Teacher, 32(7), 300–307. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2010.488705
Panjoy, R. (2005). Exit exams for college flight programs: Redundant activity or certification of competency? The Collegiate Aviation Review International, 23(1), 24–31. https://doi.org/10.22488/okstate.18.100333
Pinto, G., Bigozzi, L., Vettori, G., & Vezzani, C. (2018). The relationship between conceptions of learning and academic outcomes in middle school students according to gender differences. Learning, culture and social interaction, 16, 45-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2017.11.001
Ranganathan, M., Heise, L., Peterman, A., Roy, S., & Hidrobo, M. (2021). Cross-disciplinary intersections between public health and economics in intimate partner violence research. SSM-Population Health, 14, 100822. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2021.100822
Rau, H., Goggins, G., & Fahy, F. (2018). From invisibility to impact: Recognising the scientific and societal relevance of interdisciplinary sustainability research. Research policy, 47(1), 266-276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.11.005
Rosqvist, K., Koivisto, J. M., Vierula, J., & Haavisto, E. (2022). Instruments used in graduating nursing students’ exit exams: An integrative review. Contemporary Nurse, 58(5–6), 393–413. https://doi.org/10.1080/10376178.2022.2085593
Safdar, S., Ren, M., Chudhery, M. A. Z., Huo, J., Rehman, H. U., & Rafique, R. (2022). Using cloud-based virtual learning environments to mitigate increasing disparity in urban-rural academic competence. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 176, 121468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121468
Siddiqui, A. W., Singh, D., Samanta, R., Das, A. M., & Chhetri, P. (2020). Evaluating the role of pharmacy exit exams in advancing pharmacy practice in India: A comprehensive review. Latin American Journal of Pharmacy, 42(10), 1–11.
Slomp, D., Marynowski, R., & Ratcliffe, B. (2020). Consequences and outcomes of policies governing medium-stakes large-scale exit exams. Educational Assessment Evaluation and Accountability, 431–461. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-020-09334-8
Solana, A. A., Mandic, S., Lanaspa, E. G., Gallardo, L. O., & Casterad, J. Z. (2018). Parental barriers to active commuting to school in children: does parental gender matter?. Journal of Transport & Health, 9, 141-149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2018.03.005
Song, Y., Weisberg, L. R., Zhang, S., Tian, X., Boyer, K. E., & Israel, M. (2024). A framework for inclusive AI learning design for diverse learners. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 100212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100212
Teshome, S. W. (2024). Exit exams in higher education: A systematic literature review. Science Journal of Education, 12(4), 71–76. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjedu.20241204.14
Teshome, S. W. (2024a). The positive and negative effects of exit exams in higher education: A systematic literature review. American Journal of Education and Information Technology, 8(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajeit.20240802.14
University of Munich, Germany, & Woessmann, L. (2018). Central exit exams improve student outcomes. IZA World of Labor, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.15185/izawol.419
Warren, J. R., & Grodsky, E. (2009). Exit exams harm students who fail them—and don’t benefit students who pass them. Phi Delta Kappan, 90(9), 645–649. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172170909000908
Weir, T. (2010). Pretest/posttest assessment: The use of an entry/exit exam as an assessment tool for accredited and non-accredited journalism and mass communication programs. Journalism & Mass Communication Educator, 65(2), 123–141. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769581006500203
Zabaniotou, A. (2020). Towards gender equality in Mediterranean Engineering Schools through networking, collaborative learning, synergies and commitment to SDGs-The RMEI approach. Global Transitions, 2, 4-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.glt.2019.12.001
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Samson Worku Teshome
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms: (1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International. that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal; (2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal; (3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
JGMDS Visitors Statistic
