Implementation of the Talking Stick Model as an Effort to Improve Islamic Education Learning Outcomes in Elementary Schools
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.64420/jippg.v2i3.372Keywords:
Talking Stick Model, Islamic Education Learning, Elementary SchoolsAbstract
Objective: Islamic Education in elementary schools still uses a classical model, which results in students being less active, not independent, and many failing to achieve the Minimum Mastery Criteria (KKM). Objective: This study aims to examine the implementation of the Talking Stick learning model in improving Islamic Education learning outcomes for students at SD Negeri 95 Bengkulu Selatan. Method: The method used in this study is Classroom Action Research, which consists of four stages: planning, acting, observing, and reflecting. Results: There was a significant improvement in student learning outcomes. In the pre-cycle, the average student score was 65.7 with a mastery percentage of 40%. In Cycle I, the average score increased to 73.1 with a mastery percentage of 55%. In Cycle II, the average score increased further to 83, with a mastery percentage of 90%, indicating that the Talking Stick model is effective in improving student learning outcomes. Conclusion: The application of the Talking Stick model in Islamic Education at SD Negeri 95 Bengkulu Selatan successfully improved student learning outcomes. This improvement is reflected in the increased average scores and mastery percentage, which reached 90% in Cycle II, surpassing the established KKM. Contribution: This study contributes by offering a more effective alternative learning model, namely the Talking Stick model, which teachers can use to enhance students’ active participation, motivation, and learning outcomes in Islamic Education. It is also expected to provide insights for teachers to use more interactive and enjoyable learning models in the classroom.
References
Adiko, H. S. S., & Djafar, M. (2022). Fostering the Use of Talking Stick Learning Model on Student Learning Outcomes. Journal of Curriculum and Teaching, 14(4), 14–24. https://doi.org/10.5430/jct.v14n4p14
Amsari, D., Wahyuni, E., & Fadhilaturrahmi, F. (2024). The social learning theory Albert Bandura for elementary school students. BasicEdu: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar, 8(2), 1654-1662. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v8i2.7247
Arifin, M.B.U., & Laili, D.N. (2021). Pengaruh model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Talking Stick terhadap kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa kelas 4 pada mata pelajaran matematika. Pendas: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.23969/jp.v7i2.5877
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice Hall.
Bandura, A. (2018). A social cognitive theory of mass communication. In J. Bryant & M. B. Oliver (Eds.), Media Effects: Advances in Theory and Research (3rd ed., pp. 94–124). Routledge.
Fosnot, C. T. (2018). Constructivism: Theory, perspectives, and practice. Teachers College Press.
https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED461544
Hasfira, H., & Marelda, M. (2021). Peran guru dalam memotivasi siswa pada masa pandemi. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Konseling (JPDK), 3(1), 80–84. https://doi.org/10.31004/jpdk.v3i1.1430
Hernandi, H., Panjaitan, M., & Tamba, B. (2025). Critical Thinking Enhancement in Elementary Science Students Through the Talking Stick Learning Model. Journal of Curriculum and Teaching, 14(4), 14–24. https://doi.org/10.5430/jct.v14n4p14
Huang, X., Li, M., Zhang, Q., & Li, W. (2020). The impact of student-centered and constructivist learning on concept mastery in classroom discussion. Journal of Educational Research, 113(2), 125–138.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2019.1709405
Ifrianti, S., Shawmi, A. N., & Asyhari, A. (2020). The effect size test of the talking stick learning model on students’ critical thinking skills. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1467(1), 012061. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1467/1/012061
Kurniawan, D. (2020). Pendidikan karakter dan pembangunan warga negara demokratis dalam perspektif pendidikan nasional. Jurnal Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan, 10(1), 12–20. https://doi.org/10.20527/kewarganegaraan.v10i1.9561
Lugini, L., Litman, D., & Godley, A. (2019). Annotating Student Talk in Text-based Classroom Discussions. Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (NAACL). (Preprint) https://arxiv.org/abs/1909.03023
Mujahidah, N., & Yusdiana, Y. (2023). Application of Albert Bandura’s Social-Cognitive Theories in Teaching and Learning. Edukasi Islami: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.30868/ei.v12i02.4585
Muthmainnah, & Annas, M. (2020). Implications of the Talking Stick Method in Enhancing Students’ Communication Skills. Lisania: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Bahasa Arab, 1(1), 1–10. (PDF tersedia di https://ejournal.uinsalatiga.ac.id/index.php/lisania/article/download/798/704/13079)
Putri, D. F., & Nurtanto, M. (2021). Transformasi peran guru dalam pembelajaran berbasis partisipasi siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Indonesia, 6(3), 230–242. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpdi.v6i3.38921
Putri, V. A., & Muhtarom, T. (2024). Implikasi Kurikulum Merdeka pada Peran Guru, Perencanaan Pembelajaran, Model Pembelajaran, dan Hasil Belajar Siswa di Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Basicedu, 8(5), 3584–3599. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v8i5.8324
Rahayu, S., Halimah, M., & WS, R. (2020). Penerapan model cooperative learning tipe Talking Stick untuk meningkatkan motivasi belajar siswa. Pedadidaktika: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.17509/pedadidaktika.v5i1.7419
Sagala, S. (2019). Kemampuan profesional guru dalam meningkatkan kualitas pembelajaran. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran, 26(1), 12–21. https://doi.org/10.24114/jpp.v26i1.12045
Sari, E. R., Yusnan, M., & Matje, I. (2023). Peran guru dalam meningkatkan keaktifan belajar siswa melalui media pembelajaran. Jurnal Eduscience, 7(1), 12–22. https://doi.org/10.52791/eduscience.v7i1.3042
Sasmithaningrum, T. D. (2024). The influence of the talking stick cooperative learning model in science subjects on students’ self-confidence and interaction. Edunesia: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan, 5(2), 605–618. https://doi.org/10.51276/edu.v5i2.656
Schweisfurth, M. (2023). Learner-centred education re-examined: International perspectives on student agency and constructivist pedagogy. Teaching and Teacher Education, 125, 104056.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2023.104056
Sidabalok, D. H., Tarigan, D., Siregar, A., Simanungkalit, E., & Mailani, E. (2023). Pengaruh model kooperatif learning tipe Talking Stick untuk meningkatkan hasil belajar matematika siswa Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, 7(2), 15230–15241. https://doi.org/10.31004/jptam.v7i2.8796
Smith, B., & MacGregor, J. (2021). Cooperative learning and student interaction in higher education. Journal of Educational Psychology, 113(4), 666–681. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000567
Suryani, L. (2019). Peran guru dalam membentuk karakter peserta didik di sekolah dasar. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan, 3(1), 45–53. https://doi.org/10.31004/jip.v3i1.1020
Susanto, A. (2020). Peran guru sebagai fasilitator dalam pembelajaran abad 21. Jurnal Pendidikan Perspektif, 4(2), 101–110. https://doi.org/10.31540/jpp.v4i2.1450
Wang, S., Hsu, H.-Y., & Ching, Y.-H. (2022). Turn-taking in classroom talk: Effects on student confidence and empathy. Learning and Instruction, 75, 101–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2021.101684
Watanabe, A. (2024). Managing turn-taking and student response through a microphone gesture in an EFL classroom. JALT Journal, 46(2), 137–154. https://doi.org/10.37546/JALTJJ46.2-1
Wulandari, A., & Suprihatin, S. (2021). Peningkatan kualitas pembelajaran melalui strategi pembelajaran efektif di sekolah dasar. Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Nusantara, 7(2), 145–156. https://doi.org/10.29407/jpdn.v7i2.15984
Zhang, L. (2021). Turn-taking in EFL classroom discourse: Teacher-dominant vs. student-centered patterns. Review of Educational Theory, 4(4), 45–54. https://doi.org/10.30564/ret.v4i4.3812
Zhou, W. (2024). Exploring turn-taking strategies in classroom interaction of senior high school. Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences, 42, 599–605. https://doi.org/10.54097/mmbjb360
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Erfina Murliati, Zubaidah Zubaidah
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms: (1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International. that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal; (2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal; (3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
JIPPG Visitors Statistic
