Cognitive Biases in Digital Gambling: Insights from the South African Context
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.64420/ijcp.v3i1.513Keywords:
Cognitive biases, Digital gambling, Consumer behaviour, Engagement, Risk perceptionAbstract
Background: The rapid growth of digital gambling platforms has transformed consumer engagement while increasing psychological vulnerabilities, particularly cognitive biases that distort decision-making and risk perception. Objective: This study aims to analyse how cognitive biases influence consumer behaviour in digital gambling environments in the South African context, focusing on the interactions among cognition, platform design, and socio-economic factors. Method: A qualitative document analysis was employed, synthesising multidisciplinary literature from cognitive psychology, behavioural economics, and digital marketing to identify patterns of bias activation and reinforcement. Results: The findings reveal that overconfidence, the illusion of control, and the availability heuristic are systematically exploited through gamification, personalised marketing, and algorithmic targeting, leading to increased engagement and risk-taking behaviour. Socio-economic pressures and cultural narratives of financial mobility further intensify these effects. Conclusion: Cognitive biases operate within a socio-technical system where digital environments actively reinforce irrational decision-making, requiring more comprehensive intervention approaches. Contribution: This study offers an integrated framework that combines cognitive, technological, and contextual dimensions, advancing the development of effective consumer protection strategies, ethical platform design, and responsible gambling policies.
References
Abel, M., Cole, S., & Zia, B. (2021). Changing gambling behavior through experiential learning. The World Bank Economic Review, 35(3), 745–763. https://doi.org/10.1093/wber/lhaa016
Al-Hadrawi, B. K., & Jawad, A. R. (2024). Cognitive marketing and strategic drift: An exploration of cognitive bias in marketing decision-making. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Growth Evaluation, 5(1), 933–946.
Badu, E. (2024). Towards understanding contemporary gambling advertising in Sub‐Saharan Africa. Public Health Challenges, 3(4), e70017. https://doi.org/10.1002/puh2.70017
Bahangulu, J. K., & Berko, L. O. (2025). Algorithmic bias, data ethics, and governance: Ensuring fairness, transparency and compliance in AI-powered business analytics applications. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 25(2), 1746–1763. https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2025.25.2.0571
Bedford, K. (2024). Gambling control in a cost-of-living crisis: An analysis of the White Paper High Stakes: Gambling Reform for the Digital Age (2023). The Modern Law Review. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.12904
Bolat, E., Panourgia, C., Yankouskaya, A., & Kelly, M. (2024). Influencer driven gambling content and its impact on children and young people: Research snapshot. Gambling Research Exchange Ontario. https://www.greo.ca/Modules/EvidenceCentre/files/Bolat%20et%20al%20(2024)_Research%20Snapshot_Influencer-driven%20gambling%20content%20and%20its%20impact%20on%20children%20and%20young%20people.pdf
Cavalcanti, A. P., Barbosa, A., Carvalho, R., Freitas, F., Tsai, Y. S., Gašević, D., & Mello, R. F. (2021). Automatic feedback in online learning environments: A systematic literature review. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2, 100027. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100027
Chegere, M. J., & Falco, P. (2025). The magic of the game: Experimental evidence on sports betting behavior. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 240, 107301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2025.107301
Chinnathurai, G. D. (2025). AI-driven marketing: Ethical dilemmas in data privacy and consumer manipulation. In AI and Machine Learning in Marketing. Shanlax Publications.
Citroen, C. L. (2011). The role of information in strategic decision-making. International journal of information management, 31(6), 493-501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2011.02.005
Delfabbro, P., & Winefield, A. H. (2000). Predictors of irrational thinking in regular slot machine gamblers. The Journal of Psychology, 134(2), 117–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980009600854
Dilaku, V. A., Obasi, D. C., & Esi-Ubani, O. C. (2025). Impact of social norms and peer pressure on the adoption of sports betting apps among teenagers in Southeast Nigeria: A marketing perspective. International Academic Journal of Management and Marketing, 11(3), 1-14.
Drosatos, G., Nalbadis, F., Arden-Close, E., Baines, V., Bolat, E., Vuillier, L., ... & Ali, R. (2018). Empowering responsible online gambling by real-time persuasive information systems. In 2018 12th International conference on research challenges in information science (RCIS) (pp. 1-11). IEEE. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/8406671
Dutt, V., & Gonzalez, C. (2012). Decisions from experience reduce misconceptions about climate change. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 32(1), 19-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2011.10.003
Elem, S., Ugochukwu, S., Orji-Egwu, A., & Nwutulor, M. (2024). Television advertising influence and the gambling habits of students in selected tertiary institutions in South-East Nigeria. African Journal of Politics and Administrative Studies, 17(1), 1001–1026. https://doi.org/10.4314/ajpas.v17i1.49
Finocchiaro, J., Maio, R., Monachou, F., Patro, G. K., Raghavan, M., Stoica, A. A., & Tsirtsis, S. (2021). Bridging machine learning and mechanism design towards algorithmic fairness. In Proceedings of the 2021 ACM conference on fairness, accountability, and transparency (pp. 489-503). https://doi.org/10.1145/3442188.3445912
Gainsbury, S. M., Delfabbro, P., King, D. L., & Hing, N. (2016). An exploratory study of gambling operators’ use of social media and the latent messages conveyed. Journal of Gambling Studies, 32(1), 125–141. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-015-9525-2
García-Pérez, Á., Krotter, A., & Aonso-Diego, G. (2024). The impact of gambling advertising and marketing on online gambling behavior: An analysis based on Spanish data. Public Health, 234, 170–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2024.06.025
Guillou-Landreat, M., Gallopel-Morvan, K., Lever, D., Le Goff, D., & Le Reste, J.-Y. (2021). Gambling marketing strategies and the Internet: What do we know? A systematic review. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 12, 583817. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.583817
Islam, M. S., Azizzadeh, F., & Ali, M. (2024). Ethical deployment of cognitive biases in marketing: A framework for responsible influence. Advances in Psychology Research, 3(2), Article 1363. https://doi.org/10.59400/apr.v3i2.1363
Kabir, M. H., Sultana, S., Hossain, M. M., & Islam, S. M. A. (2025). The impact of digital marketing strategies on consumer behavior: A comprehensive review. Business & Social Sciences Review. https://doi.org/10.25163/business.3110269
Kerti, R. M. (2025). Consumer protection in the digital economy: A legal analysis of e-commerce practices and regulatory challenges. Lex Localis - Journal of Local Self-Government, 23(10), 776–786. https://doi.org/10.52152/801041
Lockton, D. (2012). Cognitive biases, heuristics and decision-making in design for behaviour change. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2124557
Mathew, J., Mer, A., Shekhar, S., & Arora, S. (2025). Recent Trends in Digital Marketing: Integrating Gamification and Interactive Elements for Enhancing Digital Experience. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-83662-188-120251027
Mihai, F., Aleca, O. E., & Iordache, D.-M. (2025). AI personalization and its influence on online gamblers’ behavior. Behavioral Sciences, 15(6), 779. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15060779
National Gambling Board of South Africa. (2024). National Gambling Statistics Financial Year Ending 31 March 2024 (Audited). Pretoria: NGB. https://www.ngb.org.za/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/National-Gambling-Statistics-Financial-Year-Ending-31-March-2024-Audited.pdf
National Gambling Board. (2013). The social impact of gambling in South Africa: Qualitative perspective [Report]. National Gambling Board. https://www.ngb.org.za/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Social-impact-of-gambling-qualitative-perspective-2013.pdf
Papadimitriou, A. (2024). Theories, strategies and elements of gamified MOOCs: a systematic literature review. Asia pacific journal of information systems, 34(1), 248-291. https://apjis.or.kr/pdf/APJIS_34_1_248.pdf
Paré, G., & Kitsiou, S. (2017). Methods for literature reviews. In F. Lau & C. Kuziemsky (Eds.), Handbook of eHealth evaluation: An evidence-based approach (Chapter 9). University of Victoria. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK481583
Paulus, D., Fathi, R., Fiedrich, F., de Walle, B. V., & Comes, T. (2024). On the interplay of data and cognitive bias in crisis information management: An exploratory study on epidemic response. Information Systems Frontiers, 26(2), 391-415. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-022-10241-0
Philander, K. S., & Gainsbury, S. M. (2021). Overconfidence in understanding of how electronic gaming machines work is related to positive attitudes. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 609731. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.609731
Quigley, E. (2020). Universal Ownership and the Polycrisis: Social Norms, Feedback Loops, and the Double Hermeneutic. Feedback Loops, and the Double Hermeneutic (May 21, 2020). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3612928
Rossi, R., & Nairn, A. (2022). New developments in gambling marketing: The rise of social media ads and its effect on youth. Current Addiction Reports, 9, 10224. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40429-022-00457-0
Ruiz de Lara, C. M., Navas, J. F., & Perales, J. C. (2019). The paradoxical relationship between emotion regulation and gambling-related cognitive biases. PLoS One, 14(8), e0220668. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0220668
Sahak, S., Rajamanickam, R., Yahya, M. S. H., & Mohamad, M. (2025). Platform accountability and user protection: A comparative analysis of regulatory approaches in Malaysia, United Kingdom and India. Journal of Posthumanism, 5(6), 1817–1826. https://doi.org/10.63332/joph.v5i6.2284
Savolainen, I., Oksanen, A., Kaakinen, M., Sirola, A., Zych, I., & Paek, H. J. (2021). The role of online group norms and social identity in youth problem gambling. Computers in Human Behavior, 122, 106828. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106828
Savolainen, I., Roukka, T., & Oksanen, A. (2025). The impact of gambling advertising online: A longitudinal study on exposure and harm. International Gambling Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/14459795.2025.2548220
Sirola, A., Kaakinen, M., Savolainen, I., Paek, H. J., Zych, I., & Oksanen, A. (2021). Online identities and social influence in social media gambling exposure: A four-country study on young people. Telematics and Informatics, 60, 101582. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2021.101582
Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
Sukhera, J. (2022). Narrative reviews: Flexible, rigorous, and practical. Journal of Graduate Medical Education, 14(4), 414–417. https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-22-00480.1
Torrance, J., John, B., Greville, J., O’Hanrahan, M., Davies, N., & Roderique-Davies, G. (2021). Emergent gambling advertising: A rapid review of marketing content, delivery and structural features. BMC Public Health, 21, 718. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-10805-w
Volosevici, D., & Isbasoiu, G. D. (2025). Surveillance as a socio-technical system: Behavioral impacts and self-regulation in monitored environments. Systems, 13(7), 614. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems13070614
Wheaton, J., Ford, B., Nairn, A., & Collard, S. (2024). Towards a conceptual framework for the prevention of gambling-related harms: Findings from a scoping review. PLoS One, 19(3), e0298005. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0298005
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Michael Mncedisi Willie
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms: (1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International. that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal; (2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal; (3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
