Grounded Theory in Practice: Reflexivity and Innovative Approaches for Modern Qualitative Studies
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.64420/sajgtie.v2i1.492Keywords:
Grounded theory, Qualitative research, Reflexivity, Methodological rigour, Theory development, NetnographyAbstract
Background: Grounded theory remains a key methodology in qualitative research, providing systematic procedures for generating theory from empirical data. However, the expansion of qualitative research contexts, including digital environments, has introduced new methodological challenges related to reflexivity, analytical rigour, and methodological transparency. Objective: This study aims to examine the development of grounded theory methodologies and explore how reflexivity and innovative methodological approaches strengthen research rigour in contemporary qualitative studies. Method: This study employs a methodological review by synthesising seminal and contemporary literature on grounded theory. The analysis focuses on major methodological traditions, including Straussian, Glaserian, and constructivist grounded theory, while also examining issues related to coding procedures, theoretical sensitivity, and literature review management. The review further considers methodological adaptations in digital contexts, particularly the integration of netnography. Results: The review shows that grounded theory has evolved into diverse methodological traditions with distinct analytical procedures. Reflexivity, transparency, and methodological flexibility are increasingly recognised as essential for ensuring credibility and rigour in qualitative research. Conclusion: Grounded theory remains a flexible and relevant methodological framework for contemporary qualitative inquiry. Contribution: This study provides a synthesis of grounded theory traditions and highlights methodological considerations that support rigorous and reflective qualitative research.
References
Adaba, G. B. (2026). Theorising sociotechnical complexity: a grounded theory framework for qualitative information systems research. Qualitative Research Journal, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1108/QRJ-06-2025-0209
Alammar, F. M., Intezari, A., Cardow, A., & Pauleen, D. J. (2019). Grounded theory in practice: Novice researchers’ choice between Straussian and Glaserian. Journal of Management Inquiry. https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492618770743
Alemu, G., Stevens, B., Ross, P., & Chandler, J. (2015). The use of a constructivist grounded theory method to explore the role of socially-constructed metadata (Web 2.0) approaches. Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Libraries, 4(3), 517-540. https://www.qqml-journal.net/index.php/qqml/article/view/264
Almusaed, A., Almssad, A., & Yitmen, I. (2025). Grounded Theory and Phenomenology. In Practice of Research Methodology in Civil Engineering and Architecture: A Comprehensive Guide (pp. 355-387). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.
Berg, S. H., Akerjordet, K., Ekstedt, M., & Aase, K. (2018). Methodological strategies in resilient health care studies: an integrative review. Safety science, 110, 300-312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2018.08.025
Birks, M., & Mills, J. (2015). Grounded theory: A practical guide (2nd ed.). Sage.
Bryant, A., & Charmaz, K. (2007). The Sage handbook of grounded theory. Sage Publications.
Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.2982.0484
Charmaz, K., & Thornberg, R. (2020). The pursuit of quality in grounded theory. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 17(3), 305–327. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1780357
Clarke, A. E. (2005). Situational analysis: Grounded theory after the postmodern turn. Sage.
Deshmukh, M., & Sharma, D. (2026). Refining semi-structured interview schedules as a foundation for criticality in grounded theory: Co-constructing migrants’ identities in India. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 1-30. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2026.2613430
Dunne, C. (2011). The place of the literature review in grounded theory research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 14(2), 111–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2010.494930
Dunne, C., & Üstündağ, B. G. (2020). Successfully managing the literature review and write-up process when using grounded theory methodology A dialogue in exploration. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 21(1), Article 18. https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-21.1.3338
Gadella Kamstra, L. S. (2025). From research challenges to methodological innovation: interview prompts as reflexive and participatory tools in language teacher motivation research. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2025.2586822
Glaser, B. G. (1978). Theoretical sensitivity: Advances in the methodology of grounded theory. Sociology Press.
Glaser, B. G. (1992). Basics of grounded theory analysis. Sociology Press.
Khan, M. I., & Khan, A. N. (2024). Exploring Management Practices and Theories through Grounded Theory: A Review. Journal of Policy Options, 7(3), 39-46. https://resdojournals.com/index.php/jpo/article/view/381
Kozinets, R. V. (2019). Netnography: The essential guide to qualitative social media research. Sage. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003001430-2
Markham, A. (2017). Reflexivity: Some techniques for interpretive researchers. Qualitative Inquiry. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1077800417695151
Mruck, K., & Mey, G. (2019). Grounded theory and self-reflexivity in the qualitative research process. In A. Bryant & K. Charmaz (Eds.), The Sage handbook of current developments in grounded theory (pp. 470–495). Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526485656.n25
Nascimento, T., Suarez, M. C., & Campos, R. D. (2022). An integrative review on online ethnography methods: differentiating theoretical bases, potentialities and limitations. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 25(4), 492-510. https://doi.org/10.1108/QMR-07-2021-0086
Oliver, C. (2011). Critical realist grounded theory: An innovative approach for social work research. British Journal of Social Work, 42(2), 371–387. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcr064
Olmos-Vega, F. M., Stalmeijer, R. E., Varpio, L., & Kahlke, R. (2023). A practical guide to reflexivity in qualitative research: AMEE Guide No. 149. Medical teacher, 45(3), 241-251. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2022.2057287
Pascua Jr, D. P. (2024). Exploring the application of grounded theory: A systematic review of methodological approaches. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Growth Evaluation, 5(4), 1362-1366. https://doi.org/10.54660/.ijmrge.2024.5.4.1362-1366
Probst, B. (2015). The eye regards itself: Benefits and challenges of reflexivity in qualitative social work research. Social Work Research, 39(1), 5–16. https://doi.org/10.1093/swr/svu028
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Publications.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Sage Publications.
Urquhart, C. (2013). Grounded theory for qualitative research. Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526402196
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Michael Mncedisi Willie
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
