A Dıfferent Perspectıve on “the Challenge of the Qur’an”

Authors

  • Halil Hilmi Sandal

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.64420/ijris.v3i1.487

Keywords:

Qur’an, Symmetry, Inimitability, Tehaddi, Mushaf, Alifi, Husrev, Hunsari

Abstract

Background: The Quranic challenge (Tehaddi) has traditionally been interpreted through linguistic excellence, rhetorical beauty, and semantic depth. However, the visual and structural organisation of the Quranic text has received relatively limited scholarly attention as a potential dimension of its inimitability. Objective: This study aims to explore whether the symmetric and ordered visual structures found across different Mushaf writing traditions offer an additional perspective on the Quranic challenge. Method: The research employs visual symmetry analysis on three Mushaf models: the Alifi Mushaf (K1), the Husrev Mushaf (K2), and the Hunsari Mushaf (K3). Sample pages from Surah Al-Baqarah, verses 164–247, were examined to identify recurring structural patterns. As a comparative, anecdotal test, the literary text A Tale of Two Cities by Charles Dickens was analysed to assess whether a similar symmetry could be reproduced in non-Quranic texts. Results: The findings reveal consistent multi-layered symmetry across the three Mushaf models: line-initial letter symmetry in the Alifi Mushaf, vertical word alignment in the Husrev Mushaf, and mirror-based page symmetry in the Hunsari Mushaf. These patterns persist across hundreds of pages. Conclusion: The Quran can therefore be viewed not only as a linguistic text but also as a visually structured textual system. Contribution: This study introduces a visual-structural perspective that complements traditional discussions of Quranic inimitability.

References

Ahmad, H., & Ghafar, N. A. (2025). Stylistic and linguistic variation in the Qur’an: Toward an integrative framework. Quantum Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 6(3), 424-433. https://doi.org/10.55197/qjssh.v6i3.705

al-Suyūṭī, J. al-D. (1996). Al-itqān fī ʿulūm al-Qurʾān (Vol. 1). Dār al-Fikr.

al-Ṭarābulusī, M. (1990). Al-kashf al-ilāhī ʿan shadīd al-ḍaʿf wa al-mawḍūʿ wa al-wāhī (M. M. A. Bakkar, Ed.). Mecca.

al-Wāḥidī, A. H. A. b. A. (1997). Asbāb al-nuzūl: Reasons for the descent of the Qur’an (N. Çağıl & N. Tetik, Trans.). İhtar Publications.

al-Zarkashī, B. (1957). Al-burhān fī ʿulūm al-Qurʾān (Vol. 1). Dār al-Maʿrifa.

Amin Hawamdeh, M. (2019). Toward a Sublime-to-Translate Literary Genre: The Quran Self-explained by Micro-and Macro-stylistic Conventions. AWEJ for Translation & Literary Studies, Volume3, Number4. http://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awejtls/vol3no4.17

Ayhan, B. (2015). Analysis of some expressions in narrations regarding the first revelation. DergiABANT, 3(6), 1–20. https://izlik.org/JA27WP49HW

Besharati, M. R., & Besharati, Z. (2022). Reinterpretation of “the Darkness of the Three” in Verse 6 of Surah al-Zumar, in Light of the Components of the Scientific Miracle of the Qur’an. http://dx.doi.org/10.37264/jiqs.v1i1.6

Bilen, Y. (2015). Tawafuq in the Qur’an. Journal of Fine Arts Institute, (32). https://www.hayrat.com.tr/

Çöğenli, M. S., & Bakırcı, S. (2014). Müsennâ tevâfuklu Kur’ân-ı Kerim. Atatürk University Faculty of Theology Publications.

Demir, Z. (2023). The approach of challenge to produce a single verse of Qur’ān (al-tahaddī with āyat) in Islamic thought and its analysis. Journal of Sakarya University Faculty of Theology, 25(48), 529–555. https://doi.org/10.17335/sakaifd.1348509

Faris, S. (2023). Exploring the divine message: Quranic studies in the context of Islamic scholarship. Dirasah International Journal of Islamic Studies, 1(2), 111-125. https://doi.org/10.59373/drs.v1i2.16

Ibn, A. I. A. A. H., & Zarzur, A. M. (1972). Muqaddimah Fi Usul Al-Tafsir.

Mansur, M. (2025). Annotated Hunsari-style Qur’an with tajwid. Retrieved December 13, 2025, from https://www.neelwafurat.com/

Mårtensson, U. (2020). Prophetic Clarity: A Comparative Approach to al-Ṭabarī's Theory of Qur'anic Language, Rhetoric, and Composition. Journal of Qur'anic Studies, 22(1), 216-268. https://doi.org/10.3366/jqs.2020.0417

Nöldeke, T., & Schwally, F. (1909). Geschichte des Qorans (Vol. 1). Leipzig.

Pahlevan, M., & Shafiei, S. (2009). Evaluation and Theoretical Criticism of Numerical Miracle of the Holy Quran. Quranic Sciences and Tradition, 42(1).

Qpilat, N., & Salam, W. (2023). Literary Contexts for Teaching Non-Arabic Learners. The International Journal of Humanities Education, 21(2), 75. https://doi.org/10.18848/2327-0063/CGP/v21i02/75-89

Radford, A. (2004). Minimalist syntax: Exploring the structure of English. Cambridge University Press.

Sayska, D. S., & Arni, J. (2016). Evidences of scientific miracle of Al-Qur’an in the modern era. Jurnal Ushuluddin, 24(1), 79-90. http://dx.doi.org/10.24014/jush.v24i1.1481

Schwarz, F. (2013). Two kinds of definites cross-linguistically. Language and Linguistics Compass, 7(10), 534–559. https://doi.org/10.1111/lnc3.12048

Shaltout, M. (1949). Tafsīr al-Qurʾān al-karīm: Sūrat al-Baqarah. Risālat al-Islām, 1(3), 221–232.

Simonović, M. G. (2024). Emergence of the discourse on the imitability of the Qur’an. Bulletin of the Institute of Ethnography SASA, 72(1), 17-41.

Tamimi, M. (n.d.). Qur’an manuscript faithful to the text of Hafiz Osman (1642–1698). Retrieved December 13, 2025, from https://t.me/HunsariQuran

Watt, W. M. (1970). Bell’s introduction to the Qurʾān. Edinburgh University Press.

Younis, A. (2026). The Phonetic Dimension of Qur’anic Readings in the Framework of Modern Phonetics. Civilization Research: Journal of Islamic Studies, 5(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.61630/crjis.v5i1.124

Downloads

Published

2026-03-31

How to Cite

Sandal, H. H. (2026). A Dıfferent Perspectıve on “the Challenge of the Qur’an”. Indonesian Journal of Research in Islamic Studies, 3(1), 33–60. https://doi.org/10.64420/ijris.v3i1.487