The Islamic Ethic of “Insāniyyah”: Reimagining Humanism, Brotherhood, and Justice in Contemporary Times
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.64420/ijris.v3i2.497Keywords:
Islamic Humanism, Insāniyyah, Human Rights in Islam, Brotherhood, Ethics, Moral Justice, Universal Values, Peaceful CoexistenceAbstract
Background: Contemporary societies face increasing challenges related to social fragmentation, intolerance, injustice, and the erosion of human dignity, highlighting the need for an ethical framework that integrates spiritual, moral, and social values. Although humanism has been widely discussed in secular philosophy, the concept of Insāniyyah in Islam as a divinely grounded model of humanism remains insufficiently explored. Objective: This study aims to systematically examine the Islamic ethic of Insāniyyah by analyzing its foundational principles in the Quran and Sunnah, with particular emphasis on human dignity, universal brotherhood, and moral justice. Method: The study employs a qualitative library research approach using descriptive and analytical methods to evaluate classical and contemporary Islamic literature. Result: The findings demonstrate that Islamic humanism is founded upon divine revelation, integrating moral responsibility, human dignity, and accountability to God within a holistic ethical framework. Unlike secular humanism, which primarily emphasizes human autonomy, the Islamic perspective harmonizes individual rights with social obligations and spiritual values, thereby promoting peaceful coexistence, mutual respect, and justice. Conclusion: Insāniyyah provides a comprehensive ethical foundation for addressing contemporary humanitarian challenges. Contribution: This study enriches the discourse on Islamic humanism by offering an integrated conceptual framework that reinforces the relevance of Islamic ethical principles in promoting inclusive, just, and peaceful societies globally.
References
Abdel Haleem, M. A. S. (2005). The Qur’an: A new translation. Oxford University Press.
al-Ahsan, A. (2008). Law, Religion and Human Dignity in the Muslim World Today: An Examination of OIC’s Cairo Declaration of Human Rights. Journal of Law and Religion, 24(2), 569–597. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0748081400001715
Al-Alwani, T. J. (1993). Adab al-ikhtilāf fī al-Islām [The ethics of disagreement in Islam] (A. W. Hamid, Trans.). International Institute of Islamic Thought.
Al-Ashqar, A. (2012). Islamic institutions and global ethics: A study of Islamic NGOs. Dar Al-Fikr.
Al-ʿAsqalānī, I. Ḥ. (n.d.). Fatḥ al-bārī bi sharḥ Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī. Dar al-Maʿrifah.
Al-Bukhārī, M. I. (n.d.). Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī. Various editions.
Al-Faruqi, I. R. (1982). Al-Tawhid: Its implications for thought and life. International Institute of Islamic Thought.
Al-Ghazālī, A. Ḥ. (n.d.). Iḥyāʾ ʿulūm al-dīn [The revival of the religious sciences]. Dār al-Maʿrifah.
Ali, M. M. (2009). Contemporary Islamic political thought: A study of Muslim thinkers. International Institute of Islamic Thought.
Al-Qaradawi, Y. (1998). Islam: The future civilization. Islamic Book Center.
Al-Shāṭibī, A. I. (1969). Al-Muwāfaqāt fī uṣūl al-sharīʿah (S. Muḥammad, Ed.). Dār al-Maʿārif.
Al-Suyūṭī, J. D. (n.d.). Al-Itqān fī ʿulūm al-Qur’ān. Maktabat Dār al-Turāth.
Al-Zarkashī, B. D. (1957). Al-Burhān fī ʿulūm al-Qur’ān. Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyyah.
American Humanist Association. (2023). What is humanism? https://americanhumanist.org/what-is-humanism/
Atochero, A. V., & Rubio, C. J. (2025). Control, Polarize, and Dehumanize the Human Being from the Hidden Power that Acts and Controls Contemporary Political Action. Open Journal of Political Science, 15(2), 417–429. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojps.2025.152023
Aṭ-Ṭanṭāwī, M. S. (2008). At-tafsīr al-wasīṭ li-l-Qur’ān al-karīm. Dār al-Salām.
Auda, J. (2008). Maqasid al-shariah as philosophy of Islamic law: A systems approach. International Institute of Islamic Thought.
Ayoob, M. (2008). The many faces of political Islam: Religion and politics in the Muslim world. University of Michigan Press.
Az-Zuḥaylī, W. (1998). At-tafsīr al-munīr. Dār al-Fikr.
Bin Bayyah, A. (2013). The objectives of Shariah in contemporary contexts. Forum for Promoting Peace in Muslim Societies.
Cambridge Dictionary. (2023). Humanism. Cambridge University Press. https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/humanism
Elliott, M. A. (2014). The Institutionalization of Human Rights and its Discontents: A World Cultural Perspective. Cultural Sociology, 8(4), 407–425. https://doi.org/10.1177/1749975514541099
Esposito, J., & Mogahed, D. (2007). Who speaks for Islam? What a billion Muslims really think. Gallup Press.
Hamidullah, M. (1968). The first written constitution in the world. Sh. Muhammad Ashraf.
Jamil, M., Abbas, S. Z., Al-Salami, A. A. A., Al-Khafaji, F. A. H., Saenko, N. R., & Ramírez-Coronel, A. A. (2023). Islamic teachings and religious brotherhood in the Islamic society. HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies, 79(1), Article a8369. https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v79i1.8369
Kamali, M. H. (2002). Freedom, equality and justice in Islam. Islamic Texts Society.
Kamali, M. H. (2008). Shari'ah law: An introduction. Oneworld Publications.
Khalifa, M. A. M. A. (2023). Modern Muslim Intellectuals and the Quest for an Islamic Episteme: Humanism as a Case Study. British Journal of Translation Linguistics and Literature, 3(1), 21–27. https://doi.org/10.54848/bjtll.v3i1.51
Kilani, A., & Suberu, A. (2015). The Medina constitution and modern pluralism: Lessons for peaceful coexistence. Journal of Islamic Studies and Culture, 3(2), 45–58.
Marshall, K., & Shea, R. (2011). Religion and conflict case study: Muslim Peace Fellowship. Berkley Center for Religion, Peace & World Affairs, Georgetown University.
Mohamad, M. Z., Khairaldin, W. K. F. W., Lateh@Junoh, H. M., Noh, N. S. C., Yusof, S., & Latif, F. Abd. (2025). The Ethics of Dialogue in a Fragmented World: A Comparative Study of Civilizational Engagement and Conflict in Contemporary Global Affairs. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 9(30), 488–494. https://doi.org/10.47772/ijriss.2025.930000062
Molla, R. I., & Dastagir, G. (2013). Faith-based ethical reform for social stability and sustainable development. Philosophical Papers and Review, 4(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.5897/ppr2013.0097
Muslim ibn al-Ḥajjāj. (n.d.). Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim. Various editions.
Nasr, S. H. (1996). Religion and the order of nature. Oxford University Press.
Nyazee, I. A. K. (2000). Theories of Islamic law: The methodology of ijtihad. Islamic Research Institute Press.
Qutb, S. (2000). Fī ẓilāl al-Qur’ān (Vol. 4, 36th ed.). Dār al-Shurūq.
Rahman, F. (1982). Islam and modernity: Transformation of an intellectual tradition. University of Chicago Press.
Ramadan, T. (2009). Radical reform: Islamic ethics and liberation. Oxford University Press.
Ṣahayb Saᶜīd. (2020). Al-’Ukhuwwah fil-Qur’ānil-Karīm: Mafāhīm wa mūjibāt. Quranica. http://www.quranica.com
Valčo, M., & Šturák, P. (2018). The “Relational Self”: Philosophical-Religious Reflections in Anthropology and Personalism. XLinguae, 11, 289–299. https://doi.org/10.18355/xl.2018.11.01xl.24
Wadud, A. (1999). Qur’an and woman: Rereading the sacred text from a woman’s perspective. Oxford University Press.
Yulianto, E., & Mokhtar, A. B. bin. (2026). Multicultural Islamic Education: An Endeavor to Integrate Human Rights Values. Socio Politica Jurnal Ilmiah Jurusan Sosiologi, 16(1), 183–196. https://doi.org/10.15575/socio-politica.v16i1.53429
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Ibrahim Suberu, Sulyman Muhammad-Busayri

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms: (1) License & Copyright: Authors retain full copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication. The work is simultaneously licensed under a CC BY-SA 4.0 International License, which allows others to share and adapt the material for any purpose, even commercially, provided proper credit is given and derivative works are shared under the same license. (2) Secondary Distribution: Authors may enter into separate, non-exclusive contractual arrangements for the distribution of the journal's published version (e.g., institutional repositories or book chapters), acknowledging its initial publication in this journal. (3) Self-Archiving: Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or personal websites) prior to and during the submission process.





